Sunday, September 25, 2011

Theory Update 114

The other formula given by number 26 uses α, the fine structure constant, starting from the observation that α-1 is close to 137. Many have attempted derivations of the modern non integral value for α using the integer 137. For instance, the Relativist James G. Gilson discusses the beautiful formula

α=cos(π/137)137

noting that other authors have expressed 137 as 27+23+20, as used by number 26. The integer 163=137+26 is a favourite Almost Integer known as Ramanujan's constant. It satisfies

eπ1636403203+744

where the decomposition of the large integer is well known in moonshine circles. Alternatively, we can write

eπ163(Ceπi/24)24-24

for C=η(z)/η(2z), where z=(1+163i)/2 and η is the Dedekind eta function. The j-invariant also appears in interesting studies of CFTs, with central charge 48. Pundits call all this numerology, but mathematicians most certainly do not. Long live the bosonic string.

10 comments:

  1. So the 3 comes from the quaternions and the 7 from the octonions, giving the 10 dimensions of the superstring. That is, we could also write 163=136+27, where 136=27+23 and of course 27=33. Qubits and qutrits.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gilson corrects the simple formula to obtain the experimental value for α with the aid of a second integer, which happens to be 26. This number is supposed to characterise Nature's difficulty in winding fields about a circle. In his paper, he cannot find any reason to consider the number 26 significant. Maybe he will change his mind.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Recall that 7 qubits show up in Duff and Ferrara's paper on tripartite entanglement and the Fano plane, where the Fano plane is often associated to the 7 octonions. The 3 qubits are associated as usual to the S,T,U dualities. The 3 qutrits are the tetractys.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Don't forget the charged leptons and up-type quarks form a Fano plane when the angle is pi/2 instead of 2/9.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good point, Dave. Actually, M theory has gazillions of these small finite structures floating around in it!

    ReplyDelete
  6. The 'near integers' are certainly worth investigating.

    Here is a mathematical structure using the 'near integers' which outputs the 'fine structure constant' very well within the newly published Codata 2010 values from NIST.

    1500625 e^(4 sqrt(58) pi))/(961 (1+sqrt(2/2396291527))^4)(4/d^4)
    ((((e^(2pi*sqrt(163)) 70^2)^(1/65536))-1)^-1)^(1/2048) =
    808017424794512875886459904961710757005754368000000000

    We get for output:

    d = 0.007297352568841518513443583197914260254...

    Its inverse:

    d^-1 = 137.03599909230556307630857983284702577811...

    Compare this to Gabrielse's 2008 combined empirical QED
    determination or the new Codata 2010: alpha =
    0.007297352569(5)

    However, there is an arbritrary construct in this and that is 1500625 e^(4 sqrt(58) pi))/(961 (1+sqrt(2/2396291527))^4 This needs to be corrected as a full 'number theoretic' value which will be very close to the Planck mass^2/electron mass^2 squared value if this is correct and solved.

    Also, there is a direct physics form for this:

    (4/d^4)(a^2/c^2)((((2a^2/b^2)^1/65536)-1)^-1)^1/2048 = very close to
    the Monster group integer

    Where a = M_pl (Planck mass), b = m_n (neutron mass), c = m_e
    (electron mass), d = alpha (fine structure constant) (all values
    Codata)

    This is an approximation with empirical data but is probably exactly
    equivalent to the 'number theoretic form'

    The new 2010 Codata vs. the old 2006 Codata is a even a better fit for all of this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mark, please use dollar signs for inline latex. Nobody can actually read these text expressions. Let me try the first line:

    1500625exp(458π)/(961(1+2/2396291527)4)(4/d4)
    ×
    ((((\exp(2 \pi \sqrt{163}) 70^2)^{1/65536} -1)^{-1})^{1/2048}
    =
    808017424794512875886459904961710757005754368000000000

    ReplyDelete
  8. Aside from what is above, here is something very interesting about eπ163.
    If you divide this by 24 you obtain a 'near integer' that is very close to a prime and it has thirteen nines in the tail which makes it a better 'near integer'. There are more examples of these and they involve dividing by 8 or 24.

    eπ16324==10939058860032030.999999999999968... This is almost the prime 10939058860032031

    Some other examples are:
    eπ4324=36864030.9999907... This is almost the prime 36864031
    eπ6724=6133248030.999999944... This is almost the prime 6133248031
    eπ588=3073907218.999999977... this is almost the prime 3073907219
    eπ58=829452.999917... This is almost the prime 829453
    eπ228=313618.99978... This is almost the prime 313619

    Next time Kea I will pay more attention to your rules.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So Heegner numbers, I see. Yes, interesting, Mark.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.