This is a more cyclic picture than the use of projective degree that we saw for the associahedron ternary triangle, reflecting the need to replace duality by triality.
15 years ago
This is a more cyclic picture than the use of projective degree that we saw for the associahedron ternary triangle, reflecting the need to replace duality by triality.

Note that the Pythagoreans knew about the number $27$, in the sense that $3^3$ appeared mystically in their multiplication table for the tetracytys.
ReplyDeleteIn fact, this M Theory tectractys is just the magic hexagon of the Tao. To preserve cyclicity, it would be better to use the mystical symbols rather than the numbers $0,1,2$.
ReplyDeleteSo the Koide phase of $6/27 = 2/9$ could be associated to the central (space generating) part, as a fraction of $1$ (rather than $2 \pi$) for the radial (cosmological) time.
ReplyDeleteAnd here is an earlier post showing how the planar dual of the tetractys is a honeycomb hexagon a la Terence Tao and coauthors.
ReplyDeleteWOW, Kea. I like this!!!
ReplyDeleteYeah, pretty cool heh? The mathematicians should like this too ...
ReplyDeleteThe mass gap? It should be the same thing? A turbulent Fermi surface?
ReplyDeletehttp://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1009/1009.0265v1.pdf
Now here is a clear link to the Platonic solides :)
Well, there are several 'mass gaps' that we could talk about. But yes, there is one here.
ReplyDelete