tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307840825023135484.post8242840251680941866..comments2023-04-16T03:44:23.949+12:00Comments on Arcadian Pseudofunctor: New Physics at D0Keahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05652514294703722285noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307840825023135484.post-59966360509668352042010-05-23T22:37:32.948+12:002010-05-23T22:37:32.948+12:00I hadn't realized that twistors are part of th...I hadn't realized that twistors are part of the plan! That helps a lot.Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10768655514143252049noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307840825023135484.post-7072676667501283312010-05-23T09:20:21.614+12:002010-05-23T09:20:21.614+12:00Mitchell, the concept of CP violation can be expla...Mitchell, the concept of CP violation can be explained to a child, and the particle zoo is built from a few simple building blocks. What is complicated, I think you will agree, is the Standard Model. But the SM never explained these parameters, and it never will. <br /><br />As for the fact that there are as yet no textbooks on categorical twistorial quantum gravity ... that is regrettable, indeed, but I am no position at present to do anything about it.Keahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05652514294703722285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307840825023135484.post-13674967675799027052010-05-22T17:19:13.728+12:002010-05-22T17:19:13.728+12:00I don't know, I've never looked for them b...I don't know, I've never looked for them before. But e.g. see the "experimenter blogs" <a href="http://muon.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. <br /><br />And it <i>is</i> a complicated topic. If you say you're approximating a matrix with other matrices of a specified form, that's simple. But the physical significance of those matrix elements is not simple. It involves kaon decay and CP violation and other rather complex phenomena. <br /><br />Also, your conceptual framework is unfamiliar. At least in F theory we know what it's all based on - the type IIB superstring. You can go to a textbook and see the basic equations behind all those branes in hyperspace.Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10768655514143252049noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307840825023135484.post-88640151358543701792010-05-22T16:12:38.913+12:002010-05-22T16:12:38.913+12:00Mitchell, all physicists should be interested in t...Mitchell, all physicists should be interested in these quantities, and what I am talking about is not at all complicated. Anyway, what blogs are you thinking of?Keahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05652514294703722285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307840825023135484.post-3660458544033408272010-05-21T21:48:04.552+12:002010-05-21T21:48:04.552+12:00"It boggles the mind how few people find this..."It boggles the mind how few people find this interesting"<br /><br />Have you mentioned it at phenomenology blogs? The mixing matrices are a complicated topic. The people most likely to take an interest are the ones already working with these quantities.Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10768655514143252049noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307840825023135484.post-8201960000913468952010-05-21T13:24:03.774+12:002010-05-21T13:24:03.774+12:00From the real part of the $(ts)$ term, we see that...From the real part of the $(ts)$ term, we see that the $0.0194$ basically comes from $abc$. That is, $\beta_s$ is just the product of our three parameters.Keahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05652514294703722285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7307840825023135484.post-90226782208475187102010-05-21T12:56:07.856+12:002010-05-21T12:56:07.856+12:00To be precise: the fit with $(24,25/108,0.0035)$ g...To be precise: the fit with $(24,25/108,0.0035)$ gives $\beta_s = 0.0194$. This cannot be adjusted much without ruining the CKM entries.Keahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05652514294703722285noreply@blogger.com